What do you guys think? Should Star Trek die or take a long break, or should they keep going?
http://www.gamespy.com/articles/547/547429p1.html
Tuesday, September 14, 2004
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Just things...
About Me
Family and friends
My other sites and blogs
Miscellaneous
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(106)
-
▼
September
(21)
- Happenings.
- Desert Heat
- Nerd for God
- It grows in bunches!
- Choices...choices...
- Nature takes its toll.
- Complete! (again)
- Gun Face.
- Hurt
- Mad crazy posting.
- No need for context.
- Complete!
- Kill Star Trek?
- I'm no preacher, but...
- Movie goings.
- May it never be.
- We just get quirckier by the year.
- Okay, seriously...
- Out of the loop.
- My spin-off.
- Out of state.
-
▼
September
(21)
5 comments:
I was a really devoted fan and tried but just couldn't stay with "Enterprise." TNG was definitely the best and I liked both DS9 and Voyager.
Even though I'd like to see a better Star Trek show, I tend to agree more with the first guy's arguments. Star Trek shouldn't die but "lay fallow" for a while.
They shouldn't have killed Data.
Atleast Star Trek went on a slow decline. Star Wars however ...
Speaking of shows that should die...
THE SIMPSONS!
Mac
My thoughts can be found here. Brought to you by danweasel's manual TrackBack protocol. ;)
Hey, Andrew! It's been a while since I've talked to you. I do visit your blog frequently, and it's a good read. Rock on.
Post a Comment